{"id":1338,"date":"2017-08-05T16:18:49","date_gmt":"2017-08-05T16:18:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/justycja.co.uk\/legal\/?p=1338"},"modified":"2017-08-05T16:18:49","modified_gmt":"2017-08-05T16:18:49","slug":"10-things-i-have-learned-in-the-allegedly-busiest-court-in-europe4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/10-things-i-have-learned-in-the-allegedly-busiest-court-in-europe4\/","title":{"rendered":"10 things I have learned in the allegedly busiest court in Europe\u2026(4)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; and other less busy ones in Scotland.<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\nAuthor: Kuba Hiterski\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/janemcphelim\/\"><span style=\"color: #0066cc;\">Jane McPhelim <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\nContinued from <a href=\"7)\t\u2018Tell him that\u2026\u2019  or we\u2019re only here to help Occasionally I am asked \u2018to interpret every single word\u2019 or worse still \u2018tell him (the accused) that XYZ will happen if\u2026\u2019 In other words, court staff varies a great deal in its understanding of how interpreting works just as interpreters vary in their skills and experience. This is very important because the expectation is that we do our job properly but not necessarily with a true understanding of what properly delivered interpreting assignment means. Some court administration staff or indeed legal professionals, judges included, may not know or remember everything we interpreters do know about our job. Again, demonstrating pragmatism and maintaining trust is critical to a successfully completed assignment. To that end we have to ensure that we do indeed interpret everything that is said, ideally having explained to the parties that we may need to omit some words whilst doing so without any adverse impact to any of the parties. Likewise, we should explain that when we interpret we speak in the 1st person.  Of course, we are hired to assist the court not to make things unnecessarily more complicated or peculiar. This means that occasionally we can\u2019t do everything \u2018by the book\u2019 and takes a lot of practice to know when to act strictly according to our code of ethics and professional conduct and when to use \u2018an unorthodox approach\u2019. Good example of the latter will be using appropriate body language such as a hand gesture when mere oral communication during solicitor\u2019s consultation with her or his client is insufficient. This, however, must be exercised with caution as the fundamental rule is that we interpreters must keep our egos in check.   8)\tDigital Age. Technology and human skills are both essential even in the Digital Age. The legal profession is changing slowly but consistently with efforts being made on an increased digitalisation including online dispute resolution and more frequent occurrence of witnesses testifying via video links. This in turn will have its impacts on court interpreting services, which includes an increased likelihood of utilising remote interpreting technology. There are also numerous new opportunities arising associated with the development of artificial intelligence which could indeed be of tremendous assistance.  Whilst many interpreters and  indeed \u2018outsiders\u2019 of the translation industry are often quick to conclude the interpreting profession will soon cease to exist, I suspect we are far from it. \"><span style=\"color: #0066cc;\">part 3<\/span><\/a> (You can also\u00a0find the whole article\u00a0on our blog\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/justycja.co.uk\/legal\/blog\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0066cc;\">here<\/span><\/a>.)<br \/>\n&#8230;<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<b>7)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Tell him that\u2026\u2019 OR we\u2019re only here to help<\/b><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\nOccasionally I am asked \u2018to interpret every single word\u2019 or worse still \u2018tell him (the accused) that XYZ will happen if\u2026\u2019 In other words, court staff vary a great deal in their understanding of how interpreting works just as interpreters vary in their skills and experience (see <a href=\"http:\/\/justycja.co.uk\/legal\/10-things-i-have-learned-in-the-allegedly-busiest-court-in-europe2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #0066cc;\">point 3<\/span><\/span><\/a>). This is very important because the expectation is there that we do our job properly but not necessarily with a true understanding of what properly delivered interpreting assignment means. Some court administration staff or indeed legal professionals, judges included, may not know or remember everything we interpreters do know about our job. Again, demonstrating pragmatism and maintaining trust is critical to a successfully completed assignment. To that end we have to ensure that we do indeed interpret everything that is said, ideally having explained to the parties that we may need to omit some words whilst doing so without any adverse impact to any of the parties. Likewise, we should explain if necessary that when we interpret we speak in the 1st person.<br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\nOf course, we are hired to assist the court not to make things unnecessarily more complicated or peculiar. This means that occasionally we can\u2019t do everything \u2018by the book\u2019 and it takes a lot of practice to know when to act strictly according to our code of ethics and professional conduct and when to use \u2018an unorthodox approach\u2019. Good example of the latter will be using appropriate body language such as a hand gesture when mere oral communication during solicitor\u2019s consultation with her or his client is insufficient. This, however, must be exercised with caution as the fundamental rule is that we interpreters must keep our egos in check.\u00a0<span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<strong>8) \u00a0 \u00a0 Technology and human skills are both essential in the Digital Age.<\/strong><br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\nThe legal profession is changing slowly but consistently with efforts being made on an increased digitalisation (see excellent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawgazette.co.uk\/news\/the-bar-change-or-get-left-behind\/5058449.article\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #0066cc;\">article <\/span><\/span><\/a>by Max Walters on &#8216;online courts&#8217;) including online dispute resolution and more frequent occurrence of witnesses testifying via video links. This in turn will have its impacts on court interpreting services, which includes an increased likelihood of utilising remote interpreting technology (which I personally commend so long our fees remain at a level expected by a professional). There are also numerous new opportunities arising associated with the development of artificial intelligence which could indeed be of tremendous assistance.\u00a0Whilst many interpreters and\u00a0indeed \u2018outsiders\u2019 of the translation industry are often quick to conclude the interpreting profession will soon cease to exist, I suspect we are far from it.<br \/>\nTBC<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; and other less busy ones in Scotland. &nbsp; Author: Kuba Hiterski\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Photo: Jane McPhelim &nbsp; Continued from part 3 (You can also\u00a0find the whole article\u00a0on our blog\u00a0here.) &#8230; &nbsp; \u00a0 7)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Tell him that\u2026\u2019 OR we\u2019re only here to help \u00a0 Occasionally I am asked \u2018to interpret every single word\u2019 or worse still \u2018tell him [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_locale":"en_US","_original_post":"1338","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","en-US"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1338\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.justycja.co.uk\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}